Skip to main content
HEAD TREKS: Icing The EV

Some months ago a journalist for a prominent Canadian newspaper published an article in support of battery electric vehicles (EV) as a more environmentally friendly alternative to internal combustion engines (ICE). This blog serves to rebut his thesis.

The journalist’s argument falls flat for a number reasons. Firstly his statement “in an age of global warming” presupposes as yet unproven scientific “fact” rather than opinion, thereby invalidating his underlying argument of the absolute superior morality of the battery electric vehicle over the internal combustion engine. Furthermore, the current diminishment in sunspot activity may actually be signalling the onset of a minor ice age, with future global warming being required to cope therewith; but that remains for another essay.

Secondly, in delineating his operational savings, he fails to take into account the massive government subsidies being thrown at the electric vehicle industry that completely neutralize, if not completely obliterate these “savings.” Lastly, he fails to recognize that electricity is not a natural element but must be generated.

Using the most recent data from the International Energy Agency, it can be noted that in 2014, world electrical generation was sourced 40% from coal, 21.6% from natural gas, 10.6% from nuclear reactors, 16.4% from hydro, 4.3% from oil and 6.3% from solar, wind, geothermal, biomass and waste. While these percentages may change over time, they are unlikely to materially do so over the 20 -25 year targeted times espoused by a number of governments for change from ICE to EV.

Ergo, and devoid of many other practicalities tied to the envisaged change, notably the millions of new charging stations required to service the forecast two billion vehicles by that time, the planet must await the invention of a truly efficient and ICE comparable battery. It can be argued that the world’s largest scientific failure has been the failure to invent and develop on a commercial scale such a battery. That over the time-framed “on the road to Damascus” this is likely to happen is conjectural while in the meantime, misplaced government ideologies continue the nearly bankrupting level of subsidies required to “compete” with ever cleaner internal combustion engines.

As a competitor offering the absolute same convenience and efficiency as the internal combustion engine, the lithium ion battery is a joke; and with its explosive tendencies, sometimes a dangerous one. Furthermore, like oil and gas, electricity must be stored for future use, and there is yet to be invented a battery of practical application in that regard.

Whether oil, gas, etc. is put directly into car engines or to produce the energy required to power electric vehicles, therefore becomes an exercise in a tight circle of contradiction, if not farce; which of course is the strength of Gorism, Suzukism, Muskism et al.


Copyright © 2018 Ian de W. Semple

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

QUICK TREKS Canadians undergoing the after effects of recent Caribbean hurricanes certainly deserve our sympathy. But why do they think that their government has to rescue them from their personal misfortunes? Oh, I forgot. Entitlement operating within the parameters of the Nanny State mentality. If America is so racially unjust, how is it that some 70% of players in the National Football League and 74% of players in the National Basketball Association are black, and for the most part multi-millionaires? Perhaps their kneel-downs should be in thanks for the opportunity they have had to flourish within, however imperfect as are they themselves, a democratic environment that offers the opportunity for achievement through personal effort and not the myth of government handout. If America is so racially oppressive, why do these players stay? Could it be, dare I inquire……..the money? Just asking. Did Jerry Jones, owner of the Dallas Cowboys NFL football team, the world’s wealth...

HEAD TREKS: Modelling and The Media

HEAD TREKS: Modelling and the Media “There is no greater enemy of ideology than science.” No, not that modelling where Millennials are seen to be prancing around in a show of stylish clothes of vapid elegance; sometimes as outerwear, sometimes as underwear, and occasionally just showing their wares with no wear on at all. The modelling in this small musing refers to modelling as undertaken by a computer under the direction of, and with inputs from, its user. In general terms, there are two types of computer modelling. Ethical modelling endeavours to predict certain events or behaviours based on the input of historical empirical data, whose past patterns may be predictive of the future. With regard to weather, computer modelling attempts to create future casts (formerly known as forecasts before the advent of political correctness and modern illiteracy) based on inputs of historical patterns. Theoretically, the more empirical inputs the modelling uses, the more accurate...